un post intéressant trouvé sur le forum anglophone. Désolée je n'ai pas le courage de traduire... c'est tiré d'une interview d'Adam Harasiewicz (qui faisait partie du jury et se trouve être aussi le professeur de Wunder)
- there were at least a few jury members who wanted first prize ex aequo for Wunder and Avdeeva (he named himself, Paleczny and Entremont)
-there were also a few who didn't see any winner (he named prof. Jasiński)
- he said that after Wund...er's Polonaise-Fantaisie Nelson Freire was so touched that he nearly cried but after all he (Freire) ranked Trifonov higher than Wunder and Avdeeva. Freire was not rather touched by Avdeeva’s playing
- he found Bozhanov a pianist ‘ with enormous talent and real personalité’, he added that a few of jury members ranked Bozhanov on 2 place overall but much of them didn’t like his style because he played himself not Chopin
-prof. Jasiński ranked Wunder in 2 place and Avdeeva in 4
- he found the final results the ‘question of taste’ and there are always ‘misunderstandings’ in the competition
- he admitted that if the rules of competition were left without change the result would be completely different but he ‘don’t know which pianist could make a profit from it.’ He added also that some jury members thought that ‘rules without change could rank some pianists too high even if they played final Concerto horribly’ (he pointed Bozhanov)
- there was no discussion in the final voting, each jury member just presented his final ranking without explanation ‘why’. He also mentioned that maybe if he was allowed to vote on Wunder the arithmetic result would rank the Austrian on the first place
- he said that Khozyainov was too immature and too sentimental for him
-he stated there was few pianists who were near to the real ‘chopinist style’. He praised some Trifonov mazurkas, he loved also Geniusas Etude in A flat Major
-he played down the importance of the fact that Avdeeva wasn’t qualified to eliminations; he repeated that her play was ‘good but not beautiful’ for him
- he accused the jury member who voted against Wunder’s appearance in the final of ‘lack of competence’ and he stated that it’s maybe kind of ‘specific asian taste’ (he didin’t say even Koyama’s name, but only ‘the Japanese jury member’)
- he said that he will rest diplomatic in concern of Polish pianists performances but nevertheless he liked Wakarecy’s simple and natural playing, he even considered him as one of laureats, he praised also Koziak’s Nocturne in F sharp Major
je ne retrouve plus la citation exacte, mais il me semble aussi que Fou Ts'ong (qui semble être un des responsables du résultat final) , a dit que les interprétations d'Avdeeva montraient la souffrance (comme si la musique de Chopin n'exprimait que ça...) contrairement à Wunder, et que ce dernier n'aurait même pas dû terminer 2ème.
Ingolf, ça t'apprendra à être heureux dans le concerto, insolent ! Avdeeva au moins faisait une tête d'enterrement ! je comprends mieux maintenant pourquoi elle a gagné
